Critic’s rating: ★★★
(127 minutes; PG-13)
“Death on the Nile,” the second Agatha Christie adaptation to be helmed by Kenneth Branagh, who also stars as the beloved mystery writer’s ace detective Hercule Poirot, feels like three films in one: The short prelude and opening sequence are so appealing that they make the main feature feel a bit like a letdown. Ultimately, that’s slightly problematic, as some might say.
The whodunit nevertheless gets off to a crackling start with a beautifully crafted black-and-white segment set in 1914, somewhere in Belgium, during a fierce World War I battle. Soldiers scurry around in the muck and grime of long trenches, and young combatant Poirot (Branagh) devises an ingenious method for carrying out a raid that once looked like a suicide mission. A fierce attack ensues, and Branagh does a marvelous job of putting viewers in the thick of the action as men in masks hurl themselves headlong into enemy terrain, while navigating immense clouds of poisonous gas. The triumphant attack ends with a literal bang. Suffice it to say that the upshot of this section might be subtitled Origin Story: How Poirot Got His Moustache. It’s a character-defining patch of facial hair, of course, and as positioned on Branagh’s nose it’s an ornate, double-decker mass of fur, a living thing that practically deserves its own zip code. Dare you not to stare.
Flash forward 23 years to a swanky London nightclub, where Poirot, now a celebrated murder hound, sits alone at a table, carefully arranging his six miniature desserts in a triangular array, savoring the jazzy blues of charismatic, tough singer Salome (Sophie Okonedo), and watching randy couples dance as if their lives depended on it. He also spies a love triangle unfolding: A good-looking pair, guy-about-town Simon Doyle (Armie Hammer) and his fiancee Jacqueline de Bellefort (Emma Mackey), are on a date when she introduces him to her old friend, the uber-wealthy and glamorous Linnet Ridgeway (Gal Gadot). The two, gyrating and swirling around on the dance floor, their bodies too closely entwined for Jackie’s comfort, only have eyes for each other, leaving Doyle’s wife-to-be dumbfounded and alone.
Several weeks later, on vacation in Egypt, Poirot is pulled into the orbit of the now-married Simon and Linnet, who happen to be honeymooning at the same resort. “I’m in hiding from cases,” says the world-weary detective, decked out in a bright white suit — think Tom Wolfe — and drinking some type of libation, a crimson red Baedeker’s Egypt travel guide resting on a nearby table. He’s delighted to meet up with his old pal, the happy-go-lucky Bouc (Tom Bateman, making an encore after appearing in Branagh’s 2017 “Murder on the Orient Express”) and his rich, rather dour and bitter mother Euphemia, a painter (an underused Annette Bening).
The three are invited to join the wedding party aboard gleaming luxury yacht SS Karnak for a spin down the Nile. The moneyed bunch also includes a group of folks in Linnet’s inner circle — her maid Louise (Rose Leslie), her cousin and attorney Katchadourian (Ali Fazal), godmother and nurse (Jennifer Saunders and Dawn French, who work together as a comedy duo on British television), and former fiance, Dr. Windlesham (a practically unrecognizable Russell Brand). The Doyles also have imported their very own entertainment from London, bringing along sassy Salome and her ambitious manager, niece Rosalie (Letitia Wright).
And so it begins, a series of crimes — no spoilers here — that, Poirot, naturally, is obliged to solve. Suspicion, as the story requires, falls on practically every member of the party, each of whom appears to have a motive, and at one point someone says that the famed detective is too eager to accuse everyone of murder. “It is a problem, I admit,” he quips. Still, he doggedly stalks his quarries, and so does his camera, which in one scene engages in the kind of near-dizzying circling that I last remember seeing in Brian De Palma’s films.
The bigger problem, of course, is that, while the gleaming interiors and even some of the CGI-enhanced Egyptian travelogue exteriors are fun to take in (more so than in the cramped confines of the “Orient Express” train), the relationships among these folks, which we’re told are intense and passionate, seem decidedly underdeveloped. And the pacing feels off, more like a rambling, meandering path to the big reveal than a thrilling ride to the conclusion that picks up steam as it goes.
Still, “Death on the Nile,” originally slated for release in 2019 and mostly shot in England, makes for a pleasant-enough voyage. Bright spots include Poirot’s often jovial and sometimes sarcastic verbal parrying with his fellow passengers, and some winning performances — particularly Mackey as the treacherous, stalking Jackie, and Okonedo as the smooth, saucy singer. “I’ve had a handful of husbands, each one a handful,” says Salome, who may or may not be an object of Poirot’s affection, when he asks about her marital status. The screenplay, by Michael Green, who also penned “Orient Express,” could have used more of those witty exchanges.
Movies are rated from 0 to 5 stars.
Follow me on Letterboxd.
Category: movie reviews
-
-
Affecting, carefully calibrated performances by Ruth Negga, Tessa Thompson (those two actresses in particular), Alexander Skarsgard, Bill Camp and others. Brilliant, literate script. Gorgeous b/w photography. Superb sense of time and place. Resonant themes around race and society.
Seriously, what’s not to like about “Passing,” the impressive feature directorial debut from Rebecca Hall?
The Oscar nominations completely passed over “Passing.” Why?
-
Critic’s rating: ★★★½
(104 minutes; PG-13)
The title alone probably telegraphs a thing or two about this French production, a vehicle for another blue-chip performance — this time half comic, half dramatic — by versatile screen veteran Isabelle Huppert. And the poster art makes it even more clear: We’re about to see a funny charmer that arrives bearing, and maybe burying, a few serious social issues.
“Mama Weed” might be thought of as an accidental caper film. Patience (Huppert), a solidly middle-class Parisian citizen with a semi-secret past in crime, is an intellectual, a fluent Arabic speaker with a PhD who makes her daily bread as a police translator. A widow for two decades, she’s desperate to dig herself out of money trouble — brought on by her late husband’s debts, the ever-increasing cost of city living, exorbitant charges for her mother’s (Liliane Rovere) nursing-home accommodations, and the needs of two congenial twentysomething daughters (Iris Bry, Rebecca Marder) who could use some financial help.
Stumbling onto a golden opportunity to grab a piece of drug-deal action, Patience decides to masquerade as a mysterious, elusive Moroccan crime boss who dispenses real, not pretend, loads of hash in exchange for big piles of Euros. Nobody buys her act, exactly, but they do business with her anyway. Of course, she devises clever methods for transporting her illegal goods and stashing her stacks.
Will her part-time lover, a French police chief (Hippolyte Girardot) and all-around nice guy who’s a single father, discover her true identity? Will the owners of the stolen hash catch up to her and mete out terrible revenge? Close calls in a spirited cat-and-mouse game, the fumbling, bumbling efforts of a pair of low-level criminals named Scotch and Cocoa Puffs, and a profitable friendship with Patience’s wily Chinese landlord (Nadja Nguyen) figure into a joyride that’s fun, funny, and occasionally suspenseful.
Director Jean-Paul Salome leavens his frothy confection with several quick sequences that are charming and telling. While standing on her balcony, Patience watches fireworks explode in the case as she suddenly, silently, hits on her money-making plan, the realization of her nefarious plan slowly spreading across her face. In her car, singing along vigorously to pop music while at a red light, she exchanges glances with a motorcyclist, who pokes good-natured fun at her and then makes a gesture suggesting that he knows what she’s up to. He doesn’t, of course, but she expresses shock, momentarily believing that someone has discovered her secret.
Yes, crime pays for Patience — and for the patient, one presumes — and Salome handily tidies up nearly all of his protagonist’s dangers and distractions.Still, one can’t help but wonder what kind of film Salome might have come up with had he delved a bit more deeply into the serious matters pressing in at the edges of his movie — social issues around drug dependency, financial struggles that force the working poor to take desperate measures, difficulties around access to quality healthcare for the elderly.
What he HAS delivered is a light, amusing treat buoyed by a smart script and yet another accomplished turn from the elegant Huppert. What’s not to like?(Fun fact: Huppert and Salome are reteaming for French thriller “The Sitting Duck.”)
Movies are rated from 0 to 5 stars.
Follow me on Letterboxd. -
Critic’s rating: ★★★★
(98 minutes; PG-13)Ably directed by actor/Renaissance Man Kenneth Branagh and mostly shot in evocative black-and-white, Belfast is a coming-of-age tale that comes off as half sentimental and half coldly realistic. Strange bedfellows, maybe, but the combination works fine for this sometimes funny, sometimes deadly serious, frequently charming story inspired by the director’s own beginnings.
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away — er, Northern Ireland, circa the summer of ’69 — “the Troubles” had Protestants hating Catholics, and vice versa, and bloody violence sometimes spilled out of the pubs and into the streets. Work was hard to find and paid little, personal debt was often debilitating, and life was largely a struggle.
Surviving the strife and striving are precocious little Buddy (Jude Hill), fresh faced and the most charming nine-year-old in the world, his pretty, vivacious, determined mom (Caitriona Balfe) and his handsome, caring, mostly apolitical dad (Jamie Dornan), devoted to his family but obligated to be away for weeks at a time to work in England. Also in the picture are kindly, loving grandparents, played seemingly effortlessly by Judi Dench and Ciaran Hinds — the pair offer a lesson in believable, lived-in onscreen chemistry.There are detours here and there, including a Catholic romantic interest for Buddy, who’s Protestant; a family member’s illness; and fun times at the movies (hey, I went to “Chitty Chitty Bang Bang” as a kid, too!)
But “Belfast” largely focuses on a decision looming over everything: Should they stay or should they go? Will Buddy and family remain in close proximity to family, friends, neighborhood and everything they’ve ever loved and known in Ireland, or will they escape their hardscrabble circumstances and ever-increasing violence by moving to England or a place even farther away? How about Vancouver? Melbourne, Australia?
As a sort of bonus, Branagh book-ends his movie with color footage of landmarks around Belfast, circa now, a mini-travelogue that no doubt would thrill Tourism Ireland, aka the Irish Tourist Board. And he limns the action with some of the best music of native son Van Morrison (unlike Branagh, Morrison grew up to be something of a crank).
Movies are rated from 0 to 5 stars
Follow me on Letterboxd. -
Critic’s rating: ★½
(158 minutes; R)Hollywood cheese, aged to perfection, perfect for pairing with your best worst wine.
Ideal for: connoisseurs of daytime soap, drama teachers looking for examples of bad overacting, and Adam Driver and Lady Gaga completists.Caveat: Jared Leto is an awful lot of fun, whether or not he bears a shred of resemblance to Paolo Gucci. He deserves his own movie, no? Or at least a mini-series.
Conspiracy theory: “Ridley Scott” is the nom de plume of the hack who actually directed the thing.
PFlicks Awards (Pflixies):
Al Pacino, for Very Special Guest From a Different Movie Altogether.
Movies are rated from 0 to 5 stars. -
Critic’s rating: ★★★
(156 minutes; PG-13)
Movie musicals aren’t exactly my favorite genre — I can mostly take or leave the ones made since the form peaked during a potent 35-year period ending in the late ’60s.Nevertheless I had high hopes for Steven Spielberg‘s update of the 1961 Robert Wise/Jerome Robbins film (adapted from the stage musical) about star-crossed lovers.
The riff on Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet,” as most know, centers on the culture-clash romance between Maria, a Catholic girl from Puerto Rico and Polish-Irish kid Tony. Amping up the drama, of course, is the youth-gang rivalry between the white Jets and the Puerto Rican Sharks in New York City’s San Juan Hill, circa the mid-’50s. There will be blood, and love, and collateral damage. Not everyone gets out alive.
Having marveled at the snappy, beautifully edited trailer, I wanted to make sure that I experienced the movie on the big screen. My gut reaction to the exuberant romantic drama, when the credits rolled: Is there anything that Spielberg CAN’T do? The dancing and balletic fighting are expertly, artfully staged, explosions of movement and sound. It’s hard not to get caught up in the sheer motion, momentum and color of those scenes.
The singing is a cut above — mostly pleasant, sometimes inspired, and not overdone. And the performances, particularly by Ansel Elgort (Tony), Rachel Zegler (Maria), Ariana DeBose (Anita), David Alvarez (Bernardo), and especially Rita Moreno, 90 (Anita in the original film), range from passable to moderately compelling. Is there chemistry between the leads, anything to explain why they’re determined to keep their love alive in the face of obvious obstacles? Not so sure. But they look good together
And yet, and yet. Sixty years later, and in the face of a rising tide of openly aggressive dog whistling, and a rising tide of white supremacy in America, Spielberg does little to nothing to update the racial issues inherent to the story, zilch to reanimate the issue with some kind of narrative tweaks that might have made his “West Side Story” feel more relevant.
His version, sorry to say, aside from the attention-getting choreography, simply feels moldy. Did I mention that it’s overlong?
Yes, Spielberg boasts the expertise and passion to make any kind of movie he’d like to make. And so he did, bringing “West Side Story” back from the dead. But he mostly left me wondering why I should care, and why one of America’s greatest living directors felt compelled to take on the challenge.
Movies are rated from 0 to 5 stars.
Follow me on Letterboxd. -
Critic’s rating: ★★★½
(85 minutes; Rated R)Somewhere in the middle of “The Assistant,” the downbeat but engaging first fiction feature from documentarian Kitty Green (“Casting JonBenet”; “Ukraine Is Not a Brothel”), the overworked Jane (Julia Garner) ventures a meeting with her firm’s human resources director. Jane doesn’t come right out and say it, exactly, but she relates that she’s disturbed by the liberties that the head of the company appears to be taking with young female employees. And she wants to do something — she’s not sure what, yet — to help, in solidarity with women like the pretty, fresh-scrubbed girl, just arrived from Idaho, that Jane escorts to the boss at an uptown hotel.
Wilcock (Matthew Macfadyen), the HR exec, rather than treating Jane’s concerns seriously, undercuts her at every turn, turning her words around, suggesting that perhaps the recently hired administrative assistant has misinterpreted the boss’s actions, and instead could simply be overreacting due to feelings of jealousy. Maybe she’s a bit hysterical, he suggests. “You’re not his type,” Wilcock tells her, in a clumsy but cutting bit of faux reassurance.
It’s an emotionally excruciating scene, expertly carried out by Garner (television’s “Ozark,” “The Americans” and “Waco”), whose face conveys an impressive range of emotions, and Macfadyen (“Pride & Prejudice,” “Death at a Funeral,” HBO’s “Succession”) as the accomplished gaslighter. He’s the rock against which she could be crushed after landing in a hard place.
There are almost no bright colors in “The Assistant,” which takes place over the course of a single day, beginning when Jane leaves her home in Queens before sunrise to be among the first at her Manhattan workplace. It’s dark outside when she arrives, and dark when she leaves. And the firm, a film-production company meant to resemble the type of organization once helmed by notorious sexual predator Harvey Weinstein, is housed in a group of rather dingy interconnected offices — there’s nothing sleek or modern or movie-business glamorous about the place. It’s all muted browns, blacks, and greens.
Not a lot happens in “The Assistant.” Aside from Jane’s meeting with the HR guy, there are no big moments. It feels like an extended character study, with Garner, in one of the year’s best, most committed performances, grinding her way through the day, mostly stuck in the claustrophobic confines of the office.
She tidies up, takes and makes calls, copies documents, communicates with the heard but never seen pompous boss, intercepts calls with his wife, and has some nominally lighthearted back-and-forth with associates (Noah Robbins, Joe Orsini) who help her construct two apology emails to the ogre.
Jane wants to be a producer someday, and, in this world, there’s no room for paying attention to her true emotions or acting on the calling of her conscience. It’s a power-struggle where alliances are everything but the winners are largely predetermined, a universe in which, sadly, too many women are forced to live.
Movies are rated from 0 to 5 stars.
Follow me on Letterboxd. -
Critic’s rating: ★★
(90 minutes; TV-Mature)
The latest entry in Adam Sandler‘s multi-film production deal with Netflix — which has brought us the execrable “The Week Of” and other lazy so-called comedies — is frontloaded with a mildly promising set-up.Tim, some kind of banking exec played by a somewhat mellowed and still barely likable David Spade, meets cute at the airport with a former beauty queen (Molly Sims) who shares his rather vanilla taste in entertainment diversions — they both heart listening to Phil Collins and reading James Patterson. Sparks fly, and they get hot and heavy in a janitor’s closet before she suddenly interrupts the fun to catch a flight. Later, they try to reconnect, but the bland Tim — what does she see in the guy? — is slow on the uptake.
Cut to a little while later. Needing a date for a company retreat at a swanky resort in Hawaii, and desperately wanting to impress his boss (Geoff Pierson), Tim gathers up his courage and texts Missy, asking her if she wants to accompany him. She texts yes. Or, rather, the woman who got the misdirected text and agrees to go is the wrong Missy (Lauren Lapkus).
Wrong, as in during their blind dinner date some months back, the hyper, loud, insanely brash Missy talked explicitly about sex, made cringe-worthy jokes, drank like a fish, and pulled out a knife she calls Sheila. And that wasn’t the half of it.
Lapkus (television’s “Orange is the New Black” and “Crashing”) by far is the best thing about the movie, a completely fearless performer whose rapid-fire dialogue, physical antics and facial expressions are, yes, frequently laugh-out-funny.
But the crazed Missy makes the trip and, well, there will be hijinks, and misunderstandings, and small roles or cameos by the likes of a variety of Sandler gang members and others, including the always unwelcome Rob Schneider, who shows up for some unfunny slapstick involving a shark. And don’t forget the old romcom formula: boy meets psycho girl, boy loses psycho girl, psycho girl saves the day and calms down, and boy gets psycho girl again.
“The Wrong Missy” is all intermittently hilarious (entirely thanks to Lapkus) and frequently misogynistic. It made me laugh, but I hated myself in the morning.
Movies are rated from 0 to 5 stars.
Follow me on Letterboxd. -
Critic’s rating: ★★
(116 minutes; R)
American tough-guy mercenary with a heart of gold and a sad backstory (Chris Hemsworth) treks to a would-be exotic foreign land — this time, crowded Dhaka, Bangladesh — to rescue an innocent, the son of a jailed crime kingpin (Pankaj Tripathi), from the clutches of another bad guy (Randeep Hooda). The opposition baddie is so over-the-top evil that he has henchmen do his dirty deeds, like throwing a child off a building and encouraging a teen minion to cut off a finger as a show of loyalty.It all feels like a glorified shoot-’em-up combat video game — ridiculously high body count, paper-thin characters, enough hardware to fill a paranoid anti-government militia type’s dreams, tightly choreographed fights and chases, and endless, pointless explosions.
Midway through the overlong two-hour action thriller, I completely stopped caring about the fate of such poorly drawn stick figures, and yet I watched it to the end, glutton for punishment that I am. The debut feature from Marvel movie stunt coordinator Sam Hargrave is based on a graphic novel, and resonates with me about as much. We’ve all seen — or played — this kind of thing before.
Movies are rated from 0 to 5 stars
Follow me at on Letterboxd.









